Alfredo Rosich Valles vs Pere Castells Prat
Tres Peons Open, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alfredo Rosich Valles vs Pere Castells Prat with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alfredo Rosich Valles (2268)
- Black
- Pere Castells Prat (1944)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Tres Peons Open
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alfredo Rosich Valles (2268) and Pere Castells Prat (1944) was played at Tres Peons Open and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alfredo Rosich Valles games or Pere Castells Prat games? This Alfredo Rosich Valles vs Pere Castells Prat encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alfredo Rosich Valles vs Pere Castells Prat?
Alfredo Rosich Valles vs Pere Castells Prat finished 1–0, a win for Alfredo Rosich Valles.
What opening was played in Alfredo Rosich Valles vs Pere Castells Prat?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alfredo Rosich Valles vs Pere Castells Prat, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.