Hugo Alberto Rosero vs Juan Carlos Perez Rodriguez
2012 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation (B41).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Hugo Alberto Rosero vs Juan Carlos Perez Rodriguez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Hugo Alberto Rosero (1649)
- Black
- Juan Carlos Perez Rodriguez (1957)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation (B41)
About this chess game
This chess game between Hugo Alberto Rosero (1649) and Juan Carlos Perez Rodriguez (1957) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation (B41). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Hugo Alberto Rosero games or Juan Carlos Perez Rodriguez games? This Hugo Alberto Rosero vs Juan Carlos Perez Rodriguez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Hugo Alberto Rosero vs Juan Carlos Perez Rodriguez?
Hugo Alberto Rosero vs Juan Carlos Perez Rodriguez (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Juan Carlos Perez Rodriguez.
What opening was played in Hugo Alberto Rosero vs Juan Carlos Perez Rodriguez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation (ECO B41).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Hugo Alberto Rosero vs Juan Carlos Perez Rodriguez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.