David Arthur Rosenkoetter vs Anthony J Roberts
CP.2006.P.00031, 2006 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Czech Variation (D17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Arthur Rosenkoetter vs Anthony J Roberts with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Arthur Rosenkoetter (971)
- Black
- Anthony J Roberts (2307)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CP.2006.P.00031
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Czech Variation (D17)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Arthur Rosenkoetter (971) and Anthony J Roberts (2307) was played at CP.2006.P.00031 in 2006 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Czech Variation (D17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Arthur Rosenkoetter games or Anthony J Roberts games? This David Arthur Rosenkoetter vs Anthony J Roberts encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Czech Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Arthur Rosenkoetter vs Anthony J Roberts?
David Arthur Rosenkoetter vs Anthony J Roberts (2006) finished 0–1, a win for Anthony J Roberts.
What opening was played in David Arthur Rosenkoetter vs Anthony J Roberts?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Czech Variation (ECO D17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Arthur Rosenkoetter vs Anthony J Roberts, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.