Thomas Rosenberg vs Holger, Dr. Kaesemann
Ruhrhalbinsel Open 15th, 2000 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thomas Rosenberg vs Holger, Dr. Kaesemann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thomas Rosenberg (1330)
- Black
- Holger, Dr. Kaesemann (1844)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Ruhrhalbinsel Open 15th
- Year
- 2000
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thomas Rosenberg (1330) and Holger, Dr. Kaesemann (1844) was played at Ruhrhalbinsel Open 15th in 2000 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (B40). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thomas Rosenberg games or Holger, Dr. Kaesemann games? This Thomas Rosenberg vs Holger, Dr. Kaesemann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: French Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thomas Rosenberg vs Holger, Dr. Kaesemann?
Thomas Rosenberg vs Holger, Dr. Kaesemann (2000) finished 1–0, a win for Thomas Rosenberg.
What opening was played in Thomas Rosenberg vs Holger, Dr. Kaesemann?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: French Variation (ECO B40).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thomas Rosenberg vs Holger, Dr. Kaesemann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.