Miguel Roquero Redondo vs Rafael Martinez Correa
17. Montalvo Mem 2025, 2025 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Open (B33).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miguel Roquero Redondo vs Rafael Martinez Correa with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miguel Roquero Redondo (2037)
- Black
- Rafael Martinez Correa (1719)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 17. Montalvo Mem 2025
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Open (B33)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miguel Roquero Redondo (2037) and Rafael Martinez Correa (1719) was played at 17. Montalvo Mem 2025 in 2025 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Open (B33). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miguel Roquero Redondo games or Rafael Martinez Correa games? This Miguel Roquero Redondo vs Rafael Martinez Correa encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Open.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miguel Roquero Redondo vs Rafael Martinez Correa?
Miguel Roquero Redondo vs Rafael Martinez Correa (2025) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Miguel Roquero Redondo vs Rafael Martinez Correa?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Open (ECO B33).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miguel Roquero Redondo vs Rafael Martinez Correa, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.