Dimitrios Ropokis vs Martin Zeman
FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000118, 2010 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dimitrios Ropokis vs Martin Zeman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dimitrios Ropokis (1678)
- Black
- Martin Zeman (2009)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000118
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dimitrios Ropokis (1678) and Martin Zeman (2009) was played at FICGS__CHESS__THEMATIC_TOURNAMENT__000118 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (E76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dimitrios Ropokis games or Martin Zeman games? This Dimitrios Ropokis vs Martin Zeman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dimitrios Ropokis vs Martin Zeman?
Dimitrios Ropokis vs Martin Zeman (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Martin Zeman.
What opening was played in Dimitrios Ropokis vs Martin Zeman?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack (ECO E76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dimitrios Ropokis vs Martin Zeman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.