Thijs Roorda vs Stef Van der Zon
7. LCT 2013, 2013 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Thijs Roorda vs Stef Van der Zon with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Thijs Roorda (2088)
- Black
- Stef Van der Zon (1870)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 7. LCT 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Thijs Roorda (2088) and Stef Van der Zon (1870) was played at 7. LCT 2013 in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (E63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Thijs Roorda games or Stef Van der Zon games? This Thijs Roorda vs Stef Van der Zon encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Thijs Roorda vs Stef Van der Zon?
Thijs Roorda vs Stef Van der Zon (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Thijs Roorda vs Stef Van der Zon?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Panno Variation (ECO E63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Thijs Roorda vs Stef Van der Zon, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.