Detlef Rook vs Andreas Husemann
RM-00159, 2015 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Detlef Rook vs Andreas Husemann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Detlef Rook (2399)
- Black
- Andreas Husemann (1760)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- RM-00159
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69)
About this chess game
This chess game between Detlef Rook (2399) and Andreas Husemann (1760) was played at RM-00159 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (E69). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Detlef Rook games or Andreas Husemann games? This Detlef Rook vs Andreas Husemann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Detlef Rook vs Andreas Husemann?
Detlef Rook vs Andreas Husemann (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Detlef Rook.
What opening was played in Detlef Rook vs Andreas Husemann?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO E69).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Detlef Rook vs Andreas Husemann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.