Samuel Rondeau vs Alain Duclos
date unknown · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Samuel Rondeau vs Alain Duclos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Samuel Rondeau (1284)
- Black
- Alain Duclos
- Result
- 0–1
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Samuel Rondeau (1284) and Alain Duclos was played and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Samuel Rondeau games or Alain Duclos games? This Samuel Rondeau vs Alain Duclos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Samuel Rondeau vs Alain Duclos?
Samuel Rondeau vs Alain Duclos finished 0–1, a win for Alain Duclos.
What opening was played in Samuel Rondeau vs Alain Duclos?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Samuel Rondeau vs Alain Duclos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.