Jacopo Romano vs Evgeny Veniaminovich Yarkov
FICGS__CHESS__RAPID_A__000191, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jacopo Romano vs Evgeny Veniaminovich Yarkov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jacopo Romano (2129)
- Black
- Evgeny Veniaminovich Yarkov (1906)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__RAPID_A__000191
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jacopo Romano (2129) and Evgeny Veniaminovich Yarkov (1906) was played at FICGS__CHESS__RAPID_A__000191 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jacopo Romano games or Evgeny Veniaminovich Yarkov games? This Jacopo Romano vs Evgeny Veniaminovich Yarkov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Modern Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jacopo Romano vs Evgeny Veniaminovich Yarkov?
Jacopo Romano vs Evgeny Veniaminovich Yarkov (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Jacopo Romano.
What opening was played in Jacopo Romano vs Evgeny Veniaminovich Yarkov?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Modern Line (ECO D11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jacopo Romano vs Evgeny Veniaminovich Yarkov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.