Joao Romano vs Simao Pintor
POR Ch Semi-Rapid Final, 2015 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joao Romano vs Simao Pintor with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joao Romano (1825)
- Black
- Simao Pintor (2005)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- POR Ch Semi-Rapid Final
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joao Romano (1825) and Simao Pintor (2005) was played at POR Ch Semi-Rapid Final in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (E62). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joao Romano games or Simao Pintor games? This Joao Romano vs Simao Pintor encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joao Romano vs Simao Pintor?
Joao Romano vs Simao Pintor (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Joao Romano.
What opening was played in Joao Romano vs Simao Pintor?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Carlsbad Variation (ECO E62).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joao Romano vs Simao Pintor, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.