Evelio Amaurys Roll Renford vs David Melendez Padro
2018 · Result 1–0 · Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (B09).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Evelio Amaurys Roll Renford vs David Melendez Padro with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Evelio Amaurys Roll Renford (2193)
- Black
- David Melendez Padro (2168)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (B09)
About this chess game
This chess game between Evelio Amaurys Roll Renford (2193) and David Melendez Padro (2168) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (B09). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Evelio Amaurys Roll Renford games or David Melendez Padro games? This Evelio Amaurys Roll Renford vs David Melendez Padro encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Evelio Amaurys Roll Renford vs David Melendez Padro?
Evelio Amaurys Roll Renford vs David Melendez Padro (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Evelio Amaurys Roll Renford.
What opening was played in Evelio Amaurys Roll Renford vs David Melendez Padro?
The game opened with the Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack (ECO B09).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Evelio Amaurys Roll Renford vs David Melendez Padro, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.