Antonio Jose Roldan Ortiz vs Arvo Reede
12. LSS Anni P-00007, 2018 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antonio Jose Roldan Ortiz vs Arvo Reede with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonio Jose Roldan Ortiz (1769)
- Black
- Arvo Reede (1652)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 12. LSS Anni P-00007
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonio Jose Roldan Ortiz (1769) and Arvo Reede (1652) was played at 12. LSS Anni P-00007 in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (D55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonio Jose Roldan Ortiz games or Arvo Reede games? This Antonio Jose Roldan Ortiz vs Arvo Reede encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonio Jose Roldan Ortiz vs Arvo Reede?
Antonio Jose Roldan Ortiz vs Arvo Reede (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Arvo Reede.
What opening was played in Antonio Jose Roldan Ortiz vs Arvo Reede?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Pillsbury Attack (ECO D55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonio Jose Roldan Ortiz vs Arvo Reede, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.