Francisco Rojas vs Richard De Jesus Bustamante Montoni
date unknown · Result ½–½ · Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Rojas vs Richard De Jesus Bustamante Montoni with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Rojas
- Black
- Richard De Jesus Bustamante Montoni (2172)
- Result
- ½–½
- Opening
- Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Rojas and Richard De Jesus Bustamante Montoni (2172) was played and finished ½–½. The opening was the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (B08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Rojas games or Richard De Jesus Bustamante Montoni games? This Francisco Rojas vs Richard De Jesus Bustamante Montoni encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Rojas vs Richard De Jesus Bustamante Montoni?
Francisco Rojas vs Richard De Jesus Bustamante Montoni finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francisco Rojas vs Richard De Jesus Bustamante Montoni?
The game opened with the Pirc Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Rojas vs Richard De Jesus Bustamante Montoni, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.