Steven Rojas Salas vs Fe Fernandez
PER Ch 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Steven Rojas Salas vs Fe Fernandez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Steven Rojas Salas (2002)
- Black
- Fe Fernandez (2410)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- PER Ch 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Steven Rojas Salas (2002) and Fe Fernandez (2410) was played at PER Ch 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Steven Rojas Salas games or Fe Fernandez games? This Steven Rojas Salas vs Fe Fernandez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Steven Rojas Salas vs Fe Fernandez?
Steven Rojas Salas vs Fe Fernandez (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Fe Fernandez.
What opening was played in Steven Rojas Salas vs Fe Fernandez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Steven Rojas Salas vs Fe Fernandez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.