Siegfried Rohler vs Friedrich Rattinger
2017 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Siegfried Rohler vs Friedrich Rattinger with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Siegfried Rohler (2141)
- Black
- Friedrich Rattinger (2092)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Siegfried Rohler (2141) and Friedrich Rattinger (2092) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (A34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Siegfried Rohler games or Friedrich Rattinger games? This Siegfried Rohler vs Friedrich Rattinger encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Siegfried Rohler vs Friedrich Rattinger?
Siegfried Rohler vs Friedrich Rattinger (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Siegfried Rohler vs Friedrich Rattinger?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Normal Variation (ECO A34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Siegfried Rohler vs Friedrich Rattinger, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.