Dorian Rogozenco vs Igors Rausis
HSK GM, 2011 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dorian Rogozenco vs Igors Rausis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dorian Rogozenco (2534)
- Black
- Igors Rausis (2484)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- HSK GM
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dorian Rogozenco (2534) and Igors Rausis (2484) was played at HSK GM in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (D63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dorian Rogozenco games or Igors Rausis games? This Dorian Rogozenco vs Igors Rausis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dorian Rogozenco vs Igors Rausis?
Dorian Rogozenco vs Igors Rausis (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Dorian Rogozenco vs Igors Rausis?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Capablanca Variation (ECO D63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dorian Rogozenco vs Igors Rausis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.