Wouter Roggeveen vs Wil Sparreboom
Haarlem Nova Open, 2004 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wouter Roggeveen vs Wil Sparreboom with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wouter Roggeveen (1966)
- Black
- Wil Sparreboom (2035)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Haarlem Nova Open
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wouter Roggeveen (1966) and Wil Sparreboom (2035) was played at Haarlem Nova Open in 2004 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C18). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wouter Roggeveen games or Wil Sparreboom games? This Wouter Roggeveen vs Wil Sparreboom encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wouter Roggeveen vs Wil Sparreboom?
Wouter Roggeveen vs Wil Sparreboom (2004) finished 0–1, a win for Wil Sparreboom.
What opening was played in Wouter Roggeveen vs Wil Sparreboom?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C18).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wouter Roggeveen vs Wil Sparreboom, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.