Mikolaj Rogacewicz vs Mark Adams
4NCL 3 South pool D, 2018 · Result 1–0 · Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense (A63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mikolaj Rogacewicz vs Mark Adams with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mikolaj Rogacewicz (1993)
- Black
- Mark Adams (1964)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 4NCL 3 South pool D
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense (A63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mikolaj Rogacewicz (1993) and Mark Adams (1964) was played at 4NCL 3 South pool D in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense (A63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mikolaj Rogacewicz games or Mark Adams games? This Mikolaj Rogacewicz vs Mark Adams encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mikolaj Rogacewicz vs Mark Adams?
Mikolaj Rogacewicz vs Mark Adams (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Mikolaj Rogacewicz.
What opening was played in Mikolaj Rogacewicz vs Mark Adams?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Hastings Defense (ECO A63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mikolaj Rogacewicz vs Mark Adams, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.