Maxim Rodshtein vs Alexander Motylev
TCh-RUS Men 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maxim Rodshtein vs Alexander Motylev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maxim Rodshtein (2698)
- Black
- Alexander Motylev (2665)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- TCh-RUS Men 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maxim Rodshtein (2698) and Alexander Motylev (2665) was played at TCh-RUS Men 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maxim Rodshtein games or Alexander Motylev games? This Maxim Rodshtein vs Alexander Motylev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maxim Rodshtein vs Alexander Motylev?
Maxim Rodshtein vs Alexander Motylev (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Alexander Motylev.
What opening was played in Maxim Rodshtein vs Alexander Motylev?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maxim Rodshtein vs Alexander Motylev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.