Abel Rodriguez Tudanca vs Jose David Perez Perez
2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Abel Rodriguez Tudanca vs Jose David Perez Perez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Abel Rodriguez Tudanca (1839)
- Black
- Jose David Perez Perez (1812)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Abel Rodriguez Tudanca (1839) and Jose David Perez Perez (1812) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Abel Rodriguez Tudanca games or Jose David Perez Perez games? This Abel Rodriguez Tudanca vs Jose David Perez Perez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Abel Rodriguez Tudanca vs Jose David Perez Perez?
Abel Rodriguez Tudanca vs Jose David Perez Perez (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Jose David Perez Perez.
What opening was played in Abel Rodriguez Tudanca vs Jose David Perez Perez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (ECO B91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Abel Rodriguez Tudanca vs Jose David Perez Perez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.