Rene Rodriguez Perez vs Mark Frank Ridding
CL3-2015.03.03, 2015 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation (B53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rene Rodriguez Perez vs Mark Frank Ridding with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rene Rodriguez Perez (1962)
- Black
- Mark Frank Ridding (1763)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CL3-2015.03.03
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation (B53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rene Rodriguez Perez (1962) and Mark Frank Ridding (1763) was played at CL3-2015.03.03 in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation (B53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rene Rodriguez Perez games or Mark Frank Ridding games? This Rene Rodriguez Perez vs Mark Frank Ridding encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rene Rodriguez Perez vs Mark Frank Ridding?
Rene Rodriguez Perez vs Mark Frank Ridding (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Mark Frank Ridding.
What opening was played in Rene Rodriguez Perez vs Mark Frank Ridding?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation (ECO B53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rene Rodriguez Perez vs Mark Frank Ridding, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.