Antonio Rodriguez Mellado vs Pablo Gonzalez Acosta
2015 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antonio Rodriguez Mellado vs Pablo Gonzalez Acosta with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonio Rodriguez Mellado (2017)
- Black
- Pablo Gonzalez Acosta (1618)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonio Rodriguez Mellado (2017) and Pablo Gonzalez Acosta (1618) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonio Rodriguez Mellado games or Pablo Gonzalez Acosta games? This Antonio Rodriguez Mellado vs Pablo Gonzalez Acosta encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonio Rodriguez Mellado vs Pablo Gonzalez Acosta?
Antonio Rodriguez Mellado vs Pablo Gonzalez Acosta (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Antonio Rodriguez Mellado vs Pablo Gonzalez Acosta?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO B22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonio Rodriguez Mellado vs Pablo Gonzalez Acosta, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.