Jorge Rodriguez Llorens vs Joaquim Lacasta Palacio
2015 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (C03).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jorge Rodriguez Llorens vs Joaquim Lacasta Palacio with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jorge Rodriguez Llorens (1767)
- Black
- Joaquim Lacasta Palacio (2106)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (C03)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jorge Rodriguez Llorens (1767) and Joaquim Lacasta Palacio (2106) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (C03). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jorge Rodriguez Llorens games or Joaquim Lacasta Palacio games? This Jorge Rodriguez Llorens vs Joaquim Lacasta Palacio encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jorge Rodriguez Llorens vs Joaquim Lacasta Palacio?
Jorge Rodriguez Llorens vs Joaquim Lacasta Palacio (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jorge Rodriguez Llorens vs Joaquim Lacasta Palacio?
The game opened with the French Defense: Tarrasch Variation (ECO C03).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jorge Rodriguez Llorens vs Joaquim Lacasta Palacio, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.