Edwar Samuel Rodriguez Cetina vs Andres Gaona Ballesteros
1421, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Bishop's Opening (C23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Edwar Samuel Rodriguez Cetina vs Andres Gaona Ballesteros with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Edwar Samuel Rodriguez Cetina (1326)
- Black
- Andres Gaona Ballesteros (1590)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 1421
- Opening
- Bishop's Opening (C23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Edwar Samuel Rodriguez Cetina (1326) and Andres Gaona Ballesteros (1590) was played at 1421 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Bishop's Opening (C23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Edwar Samuel Rodriguez Cetina games or Andres Gaona Ballesteros games? This Edwar Samuel Rodriguez Cetina vs Andres Gaona Ballesteros encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Bishop's Opening.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Edwar Samuel Rodriguez Cetina vs Andres Gaona Ballesteros?
Edwar Samuel Rodriguez Cetina vs Andres Gaona Ballesteros finished 0–1, a win for Andres Gaona Ballesteros.
What opening was played in Edwar Samuel Rodriguez Cetina vs Andres Gaona Ballesteros?
The game opened with the Bishop's Opening (ECO C23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Edwar Samuel Rodriguez Cetina vs Andres Gaona Ballesteros, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.