Waldenice de Jesus Rodrigues vs Antonio Rozeli Alves Rodrigues
2019 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game (A41).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Waldenice de Jesus Rodrigues vs Antonio Rozeli Alves Rodrigues with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Antonio Rozeli Alves Rodrigues (1769)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game (A41)
About this chess game
This chess game between Waldenice de Jesus Rodrigues and Antonio Rozeli Alves Rodrigues (1769) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game (A41). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Waldenice de Jesus Rodrigues games or Antonio Rozeli Alves Rodrigues games? This Waldenice de Jesus Rodrigues vs Antonio Rozeli Alves Rodrigues encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Waldenice de Jesus Rodrigues vs Antonio Rozeli Alves Rodrigues?
Waldenice de Jesus Rodrigues vs Antonio Rozeli Alves Rodrigues (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Antonio Rozeli Alves Rodrigues.
What opening was played in Waldenice de Jesus Rodrigues vs Antonio Rozeli Alves Rodrigues?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game (ECO A41).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Waldenice de Jesus Rodrigues vs Antonio Rozeli Alves Rodrigues, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.