Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues vs Rodrigo Porteiro
10. American Continental, 2015 · Result 1–0 · Caro-Kann Defense (B12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues vs Rodrigo Porteiro with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues (1808)
- Black
- Rodrigo Porteiro (1727)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 10. American Continental
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense (B12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues (1808) and Rodrigo Porteiro (1727) was played at 10. American Continental in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense (B12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues games or Rodrigo Porteiro games? This Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues vs Rodrigo Porteiro encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues vs Rodrigo Porteiro?
Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues vs Rodrigo Porteiro (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues.
What opening was played in Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues vs Rodrigo Porteiro?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense (ECO B12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues vs Rodrigo Porteiro, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.