Luiz Carlos Donato Rodrigues vs Rames Fialho De Freitas
IGSP op-B, date unknown · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luiz Carlos Donato Rodrigues vs Rames Fialho De Freitas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Rames Fialho De Freitas (1976)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- IGSP op-B
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luiz Carlos Donato Rodrigues and Rames Fialho De Freitas (1976) was played at IGSP op-B and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luiz Carlos Donato Rodrigues games or Rames Fialho De Freitas games? This Luiz Carlos Donato Rodrigues vs Rames Fialho De Freitas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luiz Carlos Donato Rodrigues vs Rames Fialho De Freitas?
Luiz Carlos Donato Rodrigues vs Rames Fialho De Freitas finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Luiz Carlos Donato Rodrigues vs Rames Fialho De Freitas?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (ECO A83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luiz Carlos Donato Rodrigues vs Rames Fialho De Freitas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.