Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas
2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Ernesto Rodi (2338)
- Black
- Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas (2206)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Ernesto Rodi (2338) and Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas (2206) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (B28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Ernesto Rodi games or Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas games? This Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas?
Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Luis Ernesto Rodi.
What opening was played in Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation (ECO B28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Alberto Pinheiro Mascarenhas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.