Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Paulo Moses Fucs
2017 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Paulo Moses Fucs with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luis Ernesto Rodi (2297)
- Black
- Paulo Moses Fucs (2055)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luis Ernesto Rodi (2297) and Paulo Moses Fucs (2055) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luis Ernesto Rodi games or Paulo Moses Fucs games? This Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Paulo Moses Fucs encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Paulo Moses Fucs?
Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Paulo Moses Fucs (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Luis Ernesto Rodi.
What opening was played in Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Paulo Moses Fucs?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (ECO B57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luis Ernesto Rodi vs Paulo Moses Fucs, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.