John Rodgaard vs Finnbjorn Vang
FAI Ch, 2011 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay John Rodgaard vs Finnbjorn Vang with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- John Rodgaard (2352)
- Black
- Finnbjorn Vang (2084)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- FAI Ch
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28)
About this chess game
This chess game between John Rodgaard (2352) and Finnbjorn Vang (2084) was played at FAI Ch in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (A28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more John Rodgaard games or Finnbjorn Vang games? This John Rodgaard vs Finnbjorn Vang encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won John Rodgaard vs Finnbjorn Vang?
John Rodgaard vs Finnbjorn Vang (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in John Rodgaard vs Finnbjorn Vang?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation (ECO A28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of John Rodgaard vs Finnbjorn Vang, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.