Marco Rocchetti vs Matthias, Dr. Kierzek
35. Arco Open 2013, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marco Rocchetti vs Matthias, Dr. Kierzek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marco Rocchetti (1880)
- Black
- Matthias, Dr. Kierzek (2236)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 35. Arco Open 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marco Rocchetti (1880) and Matthias, Dr. Kierzek (2236) was played at 35. Arco Open 2013 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marco Rocchetti games or Matthias, Dr. Kierzek games? This Marco Rocchetti vs Matthias, Dr. Kierzek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marco Rocchetti vs Matthias, Dr. Kierzek?
Marco Rocchetti vs Matthias, Dr. Kierzek (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Matthias, Dr. Kierzek.
What opening was played in Marco Rocchetti vs Matthias, Dr. Kierzek?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marco Rocchetti vs Matthias, Dr. Kierzek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.