Horacio Daniel Rocca vs Alfredo Cillóniz Razzeto
CLW II, 2015 · Result ½–½ · Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (C43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Horacio Daniel Rocca vs Alfredo Cillóniz Razzeto with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Horacio Daniel Rocca (2444)
- Black
- Alfredo Cillóniz Razzeto (2341)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- CLW II
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (C43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Horacio Daniel Rocca (2444) and Alfredo Cillóniz Razzeto (2341) was played at CLW II in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (C43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Horacio Daniel Rocca games or Alfredo Cillóniz Razzeto games? This Horacio Daniel Rocca vs Alfredo Cillóniz Razzeto encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Horacio Daniel Rocca vs Alfredo Cillóniz Razzeto?
Horacio Daniel Rocca vs Alfredo Cillóniz Razzeto (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Horacio Daniel Rocca vs Alfredo Cillóniz Razzeto?
The game opened with the Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (ECO C43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Horacio Daniel Rocca vs Alfredo Cillóniz Razzeto, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.