William Ritson-Morry vs Martin Blaine
BCF Ch 38th, 1951 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Fluid Attack (E78).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay William Ritson-Morry vs Martin Blaine with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- William Ritson-Morry
- Black
- Martin Blaine
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- BCF Ch 38th
- Year
- 1951
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Fluid Attack (E78)
About this chess game
This chess game between William Ritson-Morry and Martin Blaine was played at BCF Ch 38th in 1951 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Fluid Attack (E78). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more William Ritson-Morry games or Martin Blaine games? This William Ritson-Morry vs Martin Blaine encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Fluid Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won William Ritson-Morry vs Martin Blaine?
William Ritson-Morry vs Martin Blaine (1951) finished 1–0, a win for William Ritson-Morry.
What opening was played in William Ritson-Morry vs Martin Blaine?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack, Fluid Attack (ECO E78).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of William Ritson-Morry vs Martin Blaine, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.