Al Rios vs Maikel Liber Gongora Reyes
XII Open, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Al Rios vs Maikel Liber Gongora Reyes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Al Rios (2308)
- Black
- Maikel Liber Gongora Reyes (2451)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- XII Open
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Al Rios (2308) and Maikel Liber Gongora Reyes (2451) was played at XII Open in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Al Rios games or Maikel Liber Gongora Reyes games? This Al Rios vs Maikel Liber Gongora Reyes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Al Rios vs Maikel Liber Gongora Reyes?
Al Rios vs Maikel Liber Gongora Reyes (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Maikel Liber Gongora Reyes.
What opening was played in Al Rios vs Maikel Liber Gongora Reyes?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Al Rios vs Maikel Liber Gongora Reyes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.