Johannes Riedl vs Douglas Sailer
Seefeld Open 16th, 2005 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Johannes Riedl vs Douglas Sailer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Johannes Riedl (2118)
- Black
- Douglas Sailer (2187)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Seefeld Open 16th
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Johannes Riedl (2118) and Douglas Sailer (2187) was played at Seefeld Open 16th in 2005 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Johannes Riedl games or Douglas Sailer games? This Johannes Riedl vs Douglas Sailer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Johannes Riedl vs Douglas Sailer?
Johannes Riedl vs Douglas Sailer (2005) finished 0–1, a win for Douglas Sailer.
What opening was played in Johannes Riedl vs Douglas Sailer?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Johannes Riedl vs Douglas Sailer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.