Oswaldo Rico vs Pablo Alexander Ruiz Aguilar
2012 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oswaldo Rico vs Pablo Alexander Ruiz Aguilar with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oswaldo Rico (2022)
- Black
- Pablo Alexander Ruiz Aguilar (2339)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oswaldo Rico (2022) and Pablo Alexander Ruiz Aguilar (2339) was played in 2012 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oswaldo Rico games or Pablo Alexander Ruiz Aguilar games? This Oswaldo Rico vs Pablo Alexander Ruiz Aguilar encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oswaldo Rico vs Pablo Alexander Ruiz Aguilar?
Oswaldo Rico vs Pablo Alexander Ruiz Aguilar (2012) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Oswaldo Rico vs Pablo Alexander Ruiz Aguilar?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oswaldo Rico vs Pablo Alexander Ruiz Aguilar, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.