Regina Ribeiro vs Tanya Stewart
Moscow, 1994 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Regina Ribeiro vs Tanya Stewart with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Regina Ribeiro (2100)
- Black
- Tanya Stewart (2055)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Moscow
- Year
- 1994
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Regina Ribeiro (2100) and Tanya Stewart (2055) was played at Moscow in 1994 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Regina Ribeiro games or Tanya Stewart games? This Regina Ribeiro vs Tanya Stewart encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Regina Ribeiro vs Tanya Stewart?
Regina Ribeiro vs Tanya Stewart (1994) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Regina Ribeiro vs Tanya Stewart?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (ECO E67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Regina Ribeiro vs Tanya Stewart, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.