Lazaro Emel Reyes Santacruz vs Ariel Suarez Cabo
2010 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lazaro Emel Reyes Santacruz vs Ariel Suarez Cabo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lazaro Emel Reyes Santacruz (2075)
- Black
- Ariel Suarez Cabo (2091)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lazaro Emel Reyes Santacruz (2075) and Ariel Suarez Cabo (2091) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lazaro Emel Reyes Santacruz games or Ariel Suarez Cabo games? This Lazaro Emel Reyes Santacruz vs Ariel Suarez Cabo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lazaro Emel Reyes Santacruz vs Ariel Suarez Cabo?
Lazaro Emel Reyes Santacruz vs Ariel Suarez Cabo (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Lazaro Emel Reyes Santacruz.
What opening was played in Lazaro Emel Reyes Santacruz vs Ariel Suarez Cabo?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (ECO B50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lazaro Emel Reyes Santacruz vs Ariel Suarez Cabo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.