Juan Pedro Reyes Molina vs Jose Manuel 1975 Rodriguez Perez
2017 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense (D10).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juan Pedro Reyes Molina vs Jose Manuel 1975 Rodriguez Perez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Juan Pedro Reyes Molina (1647)
- Black
- Jose Manuel 1975 Rodriguez Perez (1766)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Slav Defense (D10)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juan Pedro Reyes Molina (1647) and Jose Manuel 1975 Rodriguez Perez (1766) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense (D10). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juan Pedro Reyes Molina games or Jose Manuel 1975 Rodriguez Perez games? This Juan Pedro Reyes Molina vs Jose Manuel 1975 Rodriguez Perez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juan Pedro Reyes Molina vs Jose Manuel 1975 Rodriguez Perez?
Juan Pedro Reyes Molina vs Jose Manuel 1975 Rodriguez Perez (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Jose Manuel 1975 Rodriguez Perez.
What opening was played in Juan Pedro Reyes Molina vs Jose Manuel 1975 Rodriguez Perez?
The game opened with the Slav Defense (ECO D10).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juan Pedro Reyes Molina vs Jose Manuel 1975 Rodriguez Perez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.