Alejandro Revilla Alvarez vs Eduardo Ragolta Franco
2009 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alejandro Revilla Alvarez vs Eduardo Ragolta Franco with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alejandro Revilla Alvarez (2154)
- Black
- Eduardo Ragolta Franco (2305)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alejandro Revilla Alvarez (2154) and Eduardo Ragolta Franco (2305) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alejandro Revilla Alvarez games or Eduardo Ragolta Franco games? This Alejandro Revilla Alvarez vs Eduardo Ragolta Franco encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alejandro Revilla Alvarez vs Eduardo Ragolta Franco?
Alejandro Revilla Alvarez vs Eduardo Ragolta Franco (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Eduardo Ragolta Franco.
What opening was played in Alejandro Revilla Alvarez vs Eduardo Ragolta Franco?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (ECO B30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alejandro Revilla Alvarez vs Eduardo Ragolta Franco, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.