Mateo Restrepo Borrero vs Juan Carlos Zuleta
date unknown · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mateo Restrepo Borrero vs Juan Carlos Zuleta with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mateo Restrepo Borrero (1614)
- Black
- Juan Carlos Zuleta (1862)
- Result
- 0–1
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mateo Restrepo Borrero (1614) and Juan Carlos Zuleta (1862) was played and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mateo Restrepo Borrero games or Juan Carlos Zuleta games? This Mateo Restrepo Borrero vs Juan Carlos Zuleta encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mateo Restrepo Borrero vs Juan Carlos Zuleta?
Mateo Restrepo Borrero vs Juan Carlos Zuleta finished 0–1, a win for Juan Carlos Zuleta.
What opening was played in Mateo Restrepo Borrero vs Juan Carlos Zuleta?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mateo Restrepo Borrero vs Juan Carlos Zuleta, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.