Ruslan Reshetnikov vs Oleg Privorotsky
2014 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ruslan Reshetnikov vs Oleg Privorotsky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ruslan Reshetnikov (2009)
- Black
- Oleg Privorotsky (1856)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ruslan Reshetnikov (2009) and Oleg Privorotsky (1856) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ruslan Reshetnikov games or Oleg Privorotsky games? This Ruslan Reshetnikov vs Oleg Privorotsky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ruslan Reshetnikov vs Oleg Privorotsky?
Ruslan Reshetnikov vs Oleg Privorotsky (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Ruslan Reshetnikov vs Oleg Privorotsky?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (ECO D27).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ruslan Reshetnikov vs Oleg Privorotsky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.