Luke Remus Elliot vs Kai Pannwitz
GBR-ch103 U15, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luke Remus Elliot vs Kai Pannwitz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luke Remus Elliot (1739)
- Black
- Kai Pannwitz (1907)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- GBR-ch103 U15
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luke Remus Elliot (1739) and Kai Pannwitz (1907) was played at GBR-ch103 U15 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luke Remus Elliot games or Kai Pannwitz games? This Luke Remus Elliot vs Kai Pannwitz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luke Remus Elliot vs Kai Pannwitz?
Luke Remus Elliot vs Kai Pannwitz (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Luke Remus Elliot.
What opening was played in Luke Remus Elliot vs Kai Pannwitz?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luke Remus Elliot vs Kai Pannwitz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.