Francisco Remoli Sargues vs Carlos Alarcia Astiz
2007 · Result ½–½ · Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Remoli Sargues vs Carlos Alarcia Astiz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Remoli Sargues (2267)
- Black
- Carlos Alarcia Astiz (2173)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2007
- Opening
- Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Remoli Sargues (2267) and Carlos Alarcia Astiz (2173) was played in 2007 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (B19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Remoli Sargues games or Carlos Alarcia Astiz games? This Francisco Remoli Sargues vs Carlos Alarcia Astiz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Remoli Sargues vs Carlos Alarcia Astiz?
Francisco Remoli Sargues vs Carlos Alarcia Astiz (2007) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francisco Remoli Sargues vs Carlos Alarcia Astiz?
The game opened with the Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation (ECO B19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Remoli Sargues vs Carlos Alarcia Astiz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.