Volker Remmler vs Karl-Heinz Huettemann
2010 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (E49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Volker Remmler vs Karl-Heinz Huettemann with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Volker Remmler (2148)
- Black
- Karl-Heinz Huettemann (2249)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (E49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Volker Remmler (2148) and Karl-Heinz Huettemann (2249) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (E49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Volker Remmler games or Karl-Heinz Huettemann games? This Volker Remmler vs Karl-Heinz Huettemann encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Volker Remmler vs Karl-Heinz Huettemann?
Volker Remmler vs Karl-Heinz Huettemann (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Volker Remmler vs Karl-Heinz Huettemann?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (ECO E49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Volker Remmler vs Karl-Heinz Huettemann, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.