Theresia Reiter vs Leo Erholsam-Holzer
6. Kavalier Open, 2011 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Theresia Reiter vs Leo Erholsam-Holzer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Theresia Reiter (1696)
- Black
- Leo Erholsam-Holzer (1987)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 6. Kavalier Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Theresia Reiter (1696) and Leo Erholsam-Holzer (1987) was played at 6. Kavalier Open in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Theresia Reiter games or Leo Erholsam-Holzer games? This Theresia Reiter vs Leo Erholsam-Holzer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Theresia Reiter vs Leo Erholsam-Holzer?
Theresia Reiter vs Leo Erholsam-Holzer (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Theresia Reiter vs Leo Erholsam-Holzer?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (ECO B52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Theresia Reiter vs Leo Erholsam-Holzer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.