Paulo F. Jatoba de Oliveira Reis vs Andrew Taber
date unknown · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paulo F. Jatoba de Oliveira Reis vs Andrew Taber with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paulo F. Jatoba de Oliveira Reis (2301)
- Black
- Andrew Taber
- Result
- 1–0
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paulo F. Jatoba de Oliveira Reis (2301) and Andrew Taber was played and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paulo F. Jatoba de Oliveira Reis games or Andrew Taber games? This Paulo F. Jatoba de Oliveira Reis vs Andrew Taber encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paulo F. Jatoba de Oliveira Reis vs Andrew Taber?
Paulo F. Jatoba de Oliveira Reis vs Andrew Taber finished 1–0, a win for Paulo F. Jatoba de Oliveira Reis.
What opening was played in Paulo F. Jatoba de Oliveira Reis vs Andrew Taber?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paulo F. Jatoba de Oliveira Reis vs Andrew Taber, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.