Emilio Reina Guerra vs Cecilio Soto Palomo
ESP/W/P/080 (ESP), 2016 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Closed, Delayed Exchange (C85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Emilio Reina Guerra vs Cecilio Soto Palomo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Emilio Reina Guerra (1959)
- Black
- Cecilio Soto Palomo (1931)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ESP/W/P/080 (ESP)
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Closed, Delayed Exchange (C85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Emilio Reina Guerra (1959) and Cecilio Soto Palomo (1931) was played at ESP/W/P/080 (ESP) in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Delayed Exchange (C85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Emilio Reina Guerra games or Cecilio Soto Palomo games? This Emilio Reina Guerra vs Cecilio Soto Palomo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Delayed Exchange.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Emilio Reina Guerra vs Cecilio Soto Palomo?
Emilio Reina Guerra vs Cecilio Soto Palomo (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Emilio Reina Guerra.
What opening was played in Emilio Reina Guerra vs Cecilio Soto Palomo?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Closed, Delayed Exchange (ECO C85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Emilio Reina Guerra vs Cecilio Soto Palomo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.