Emilio Reina Guerra vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez
ESP/TC10/2 (ESP), 2016 · Result ½–½ · Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation (C68).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Emilio Reina Guerra vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Emilio Reina Guerra (1959)
- Black
- Manuel Piqueras Jiménez (1931)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ESP/TC10/2 (ESP)
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation (C68)
About this chess game
This chess game between Emilio Reina Guerra (1959) and Manuel Piqueras Jiménez (1931) was played at ESP/TC10/2 (ESP) in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation (C68). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Emilio Reina Guerra games or Manuel Piqueras Jiménez games? This Emilio Reina Guerra vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Emilio Reina Guerra vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez?
Emilio Reina Guerra vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Emilio Reina Guerra vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation (ECO C68).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Emilio Reina Guerra vs Manuel Piqueras Jiménez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.